[1] If Eddie’s the killer, then he planted the key at the murder scene if and only if he used the key we found at his place. [2] But Eddie used the key we found at his place only if the murder was committed on Tuesday—[3] and it wasn’t. [4] Eddie’s the killer only if he was at the murder scene and planted a key there. Therefore, Eddie’s not the killer.
Let: E = Eddie’s the killer
K = Eddie used the key we found at his place
M = Eddie was at the murder scene
P = Eddie planted the key at the murder scene
T = The murder was committed on Tuesday
Represent the argument and prove the conclusion.
Solution:
(1) E → (P ≡ K))
(2) (K → T)
(3) ~T
(4) E → (M & P)
∴ ~E
(5) E Assumption for RAA
(6) P ≡ K 1, 5 Modus Ponens
(7) M & P 1, 4 Modus Ponens
(8) P 7 &-Elimination
(9) K 6, 8 ≡-Elimination
(10) T 2, 9 Modus Ponens
(11) T & ~T 3, 10 &-Introduction
(12) ~E 5-11 RAA
No comments:
Post a Comment